Cycling Rates by Country

Distance travelled by Bikes in Different Countries

Distance travelled by Bikes in Different Countries

A statistics that won’t surprise many. The US and UK both have pitiful cycle rates compared to other European countries such as Holland, Denmark and Germany. A slight surprise Spain has such a low rate of cycling.

Death Rates by Country

Death Rates by Country for Cycling

An almost inverse proportion. The US with the lowest rate of cycling has by far the worst cycling injury and fatality rate.

Distance Travelled and safety

Distance Travelled and safety

After 1950, the Netherlands (like all industrialised countries had a sharp decline in cycle rates as people took to the car. The difference was that Netherlands made a concerted effort to encourage cycling – (even if it meant discouraging cars). Their efforts in increasing bike use have been well rewarded. As cycle rates picked up, the fatality rate of cyclists fell dramatically.

Cycling is so much more safer in Netherlands that it is hardly surprising there is little enthusaism for wearing a helmet. Ask an American about wearing a helmet and usually they find it hard to imagine riding without one.
cycling

Cycling Utopia – People enjoying getting around by bike

Amsterdam Cycling

Amsterdam Cycling

Note: The statistics are taken from an authoritative report – Making Cycling Irresistable – Rutgers

I hope this doesn’t put people off cycling in the US and UK. Cycling is still relatively safe see:



26 Responses to Cycling Rates by Country

  1. Lionel O'Hara June 17, 2012 at 2:18 pm #

    In order for The UK to copy the Dutch format we first have to change our Highway code: it wasn’t until that was done in the Netherlands that cycling really took off. The law there states: cyclists must give way to predestines and cars must give way to cyclists. Then came purpose built cycle paths / lanes : but the Dutch had to fight government for these changes there os plenty of footage on the net of the Dutch protesting to protect cyclists. We in the UK are anout 20 years behind counties like the Netherlands Denmark and German but we can narrow the gap faster if the our leaders who cycle get off their bikes and do something more effective for the rest of us. Lionel O’Hara

    • tejvan June 18, 2012 at 11:15 am #

      Yes, good point. You have to work hard to improve local transport networks.

  2. Wire Donkey April 27, 2012 at 10:35 am #

    We have the cities and roads we decided to build and ours have been build for the motorcar in mind and in conflict with pedestrians and cyclists. The Netherlands and Denmark are two dynamic economies where city planners have catered for cyclists’ needs for decades. This doesn’t mean that with goodwill and over time British cities couldn’t become leaner and cleaner, with less noisy cars, less pollution, less obesity, more freedom for younger people, more and safer cycling. See what cycling in some parts of Britain looks like: http://iitm.be/ccyclists – We can “go Dutch” if we want to.

  3. John Rawlins June 12, 2011 at 8:33 pm #

    You are right to remark that the low rate of cycling in Spain is a surprise. Until recently, most Spaniards would have felt rather humiliated to be seen on a bicycle and the only exceptions were members of weekend cycling clubs. Urban utility cycling appealed to very few men and practically no women at all. However, this situation has changed dramatically over the past ten years and cities such as Barcelona, Valencia, and Seville now have significant numbers of cyclists (Madrid remains a little behind the times). As an example of this cycling boom, Valencia introduced a bike rental scheme in the spring of 2010 and attracted more than 70,000 paid members in less than year. The government recently said it will introduce legislation giving cyclists the explicit right to cycle in the centre of the lane on all urban roads with speed limits of 50kph or less.

  4. M J Wardlaw February 13, 2011 at 9:54 pm #

    The differnt risks of cycling in NL versus UK or USA do not explain the greater interest in helmets in UK and USA. The difference in risk between driving in UK and France is actually greater than the risk difference between cycling in NL and the UK – but there is no interest in driving helmets in France.
    The key issue is social isolation. Where the rate of cycling per capita is low, it causes a distortion in the perception of risk that leads to fixation with helmets. In the UK, 85% of people NEVER cycle at all. Which is to say that the vast majority of UK people only know about cycling from the crap they read in the papers, hear from safety campaigners etc etc. No wonder they think it is dangerous. The attitude of cyclists is disappointing, however.
    There is no solution I am aware of.

  5. Pien April 19, 2009 at 7:40 pm #

    The Netherlands are as flat as a euro. That’s a major reason for the popularity of cycling. Also the infrastructure for bicycles is very good, as was said before, and the cities/towns are compact so everything is easy to reach by bike.

  6. David Hembrow April 3, 2009 at 8:35 pm #

    Mike, it’s quite simple. It’s much more pleasant to cycle in the Netherlands than anywhere else. There is never any stress or conflict if you cycle and routes are made direct for cyclists (more so than if you drive).

  7. mike March 31, 2009 at 8:04 pm #

    I would love to know why its so much higher in the Netherlands than anywhere else.

    • Lung the Younger May 28, 2012 at 3:10 pm #

      Having no hills might have something to do with it Mike.

      I live in Barcelona and the whole city is just one big slope although as John mentioned, the urban cycling situation is improving in both infrestructure and numbers. They have a municipal biking system here and the bikes are parked all over the city but there’s a problem. The users tend to grab a bike in the morning and cycle downtown (or to the beach) but almost none of them want to cycle back uphill again. So there’s a logjam and special vans have to be used to redistribute the bikes every day. I imagine Rotterdam doesn’t have this problem.

      • tejvan May 28, 2012 at 4:09 pm #

        my friends in Bristol say steep hills don’t discourage people cycling.

  8. David March 30, 2009 at 7:17 pm #

    Fascinating stats. The correlation with helmet use is particularly interesting.

    I don’t wear a helmet and for a long time I felt that I probably should. But since reading things like the following, I realised the risk equation is more complicated than I had thought:

    [from http://www.movingtargetzine.com/article/helmets “There is also some evidence that motorists drive closer to helmet-wearing cyclist, which is an unintended, and unfortunate, consequence of bicycle helmets. This is an example of risk compensation. Risk compensation occurs where safety measures are in place that make people feel that the risk of a collision is reduced, therefore it’s safe to go a bit faster, or closer, or pay less attention, thus subverting the extra level of safety.”

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Anti-cycling John Forester versus the facts about Holland | The Alternative Department for Transport - October 26, 2012

    [...] Because the last time I looked, the average US cycling speed was almost zero, considering that pretty much nobody rides a bike there. He seems to be arguing for elitism in cycling, showing his belief that riding a bike should be [...]

  2. Cycling Records | Cycling UK - June 8, 2011

    [...] Cycle Rates by Country [...]

  3. Cars and Bikes Together | Cycling UK - May 26, 2011

    [...] When there are so many cyclists around it actually encourages better driving. Motorists have to be more aware and it encourages slower driving speed. This may sound just like my observation. But, there is an undoubted link between high bike usuage and safer levels of cycling. Cycle rates by country [...]

  4. Cycling Stats in UK | Cycling UK - April 25, 2011

    [...] Cycle Rates by country [...]

  5. Cycling Facts | Cycling UK - April 23, 2011

    [...] In the US, this rate is 0.1 Km per person. In the UK 0.2Km (Cycling Rates by country) [...]

  6. Cycle Safety | Cycling UK - April 15, 2011

    [...] KM. This is why countries with high rates of cycling, typically have lower accident per KM rates. Cycle fatalities per country. There is also a virtuous circle. If the roads are deemed safe, then it will encourage more people [...]

  7. Top 10 Countries with Most Bicycles per Capita | Top 10 Hell - March 13, 2011

    [...] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [...]

  8. Death Rates by Mode of Transport | Cycling UK - February 7, 2011

    [...] Death rates for cycling is inverse to the numbers cycling. In countries such as US, there is the lowest cycle use, but, the highest rate of death per KM. Netherlands has a higher cycle use, and one of the lowest death rates. See: Death rates per country [...]

  9. Q&A with Mikael Colville-Andersen: The Controversy Over Bike Helmets | TheCityFix.com - January 20, 2011

    [...] convenient and safe through cycling infrastructure and policy. Take, for example, the Netherlands: cycling was at its lowest in the late 1970s, but at this point, cycling also became the most dangero…. As cycling rates crept up after this decade, corresponding rates of fatalities went down. Urban [...]

  10. Cycling Dangers – Perceived and Real | Cycling UK - July 25, 2010

    [...] The bad news is that these statistics were calculated from the Netherlands. In the Netherlands, the incidence of bike accidents to distance travelled is one of the lowest in the world. In the UK and US, the typical average mortality from traffic accidents is likely to be higher than the average of 5-9 days of the Netherlands. But, even so, even if mortality rates in UK are triple Netherlands, the benefits of cycling still far outweigh costs. See: Cycling Fatality Rates  by Country [...]

  11. Cycling - Safety in Numbers | Cycling UK - July 15, 2009

    [...] report certaintly backs up the global statistic (cycle rates by Country) showing a marked correlation between cycling rates and cycling fatalities. safety numbers – [...]

  12. Streetsblog » In New York, More Proof of Safety in Numbers for Cyclists - June 5, 2009

    [...] in numbers" also explains why the U.S. has such a high rate of cyclist injuries and fatalities compared to countries like the Netherlands and Denmar…, where biking is much more common. And it’s pretty much Exhibit A when it comes to proving the [...]

  13. Streetsblog » Safety in Numbers: It’s Happening in NYC - June 5, 2009

    [...] in numbers" also explains why the U.S. has such a high rate of cyclist injuries and fatalities compared to countries like the Netherlands and Denmar…, where biking is much more common. And it’s pretty much Exhibit A when it comes to proving the [...]

  14. Improving Safety of Cycling | Cycling UK - April 27, 2009

    [...] It seems cycling safety varies alot from country to country. cycle rates by country [...]

  15. Bicycling in Dutch Style « Entangled - April 17, 2009

    [...] Maybe that difference (*) can explain why there are more cycling injuries per 10 million km in US than in Netherlands, despite that the average distance cycled per person in Netherlands is 25 times longer than in US. Check out these two articles from Cycling UK, Cycling in Holland and Cycling Rates by Country. [...]

Leave a Reply


1 + = 3