Road Design for Creating More Space

One of the most popular cycle campaigns is the simple message – Give Cyclists Room.

cyclist

Cars squeezing through road narrowing scheme. But, better road design could have avoided this. (It would also lead to better traffic flow)

 

The basic principle of ‘give cyclists more room‘ is:

  1. Cycling becomes safer. Less likely to be knocked off by passing motor vehicle misjudging how close you are.
  2. Cycling becomes more enjoyable (less stressful). When cars pass at 50mph with only a few inches to spare it is not a nice experience. You may not always be conscious of it, but unconsciously your nerves are being tested.
  3. Sometimes it is unavoidable to swerve away from a pothole, but if a car is passing with only a few inches, you are caught between a rock and a hard place. Numerous times I have ridden over potholes because swerving out is too dangerous (A reason to ride out a metre from road)

A few months ago, I was chatting to an acquaintance from Zurich. For some reason, he thought it completely appropriate to speak a few inches from my face. Maybe I’m a country bumpkin at heart, but I couldn’t deal with this invasion of ‘personal space’ Unconsciously you withdraw and protect your personal space. Unfortunately, this chap didn’t have much tact or awareness and he kept encroaching on my concept of personal space. I was defensively walking backwards, eventually I stuck out a long leg as an impenetrable barrier. At last, I had that degree of personal space I needed.

When on the roads, it’s a similar situation, but as a cyclist there’s not much you can do, but accept it. Part of the problem is that motor drivers are much less sensitive to personal space. They frequently pass obstacles with only cm to spare. Motorists are less sensitive to space because:

  • They actually feel removed from the obstacle, the car is something separate to them
  • Motorists can be bad at judging where there car actually ends. (some might argue the numerous scrapes on my own car are a result of my own failure to know where my own garden wall is in relation to my car. I would defend by saying my garden wall has a tendency to move around, especially when dark)
  • Motorists are protected by impenetrable armoured layers of metal. The large fall in road deaths in recent decades, is partly due to the improvement in safety design of cars. Car safety is really pretty impressive. Put yourself in an ‘armoured’ SUV and you can have a feeling of security, which is simply impossible on a bicycle. The sad thing is that improvements in car safety arguably make motorists less concerned about safe driving. If you have a collision, there is a knowledge the car will absorb part of it.

As a cyclist it is hard to protect your personal space. Like my example of person from Zurich, you can try sticking an arm or leg out – but it’s not as effective and not recommended on British roads. (though see: tips for defensive cycling)

Road Design and Personal Space

To reduce accidents from speeding cars, councils have found that traffic calming measures are quite effective. As a cyclist, I’m glad to see 20mph zones. Speed limits are not enough because they are ignored. But, speed humps can prevent excess speeding. However, the design of traffic calming measures varies enormously.

Road Hump Which Reduces Width of Road

cyclist space

This traffic calming measures mean that the road width is squeezed. You can fit a bicycle and car in this reduced space. But motorists tend to want to drive in middle to avoid worse of speed hump.

Compare this Traffic Calming measure to the one below a few miles away.

lane

Ideally, the picture would show cyclist in cycle lane. The point is that if a car at been coming, you can safely avoid the oncoming car by using cycle path.

Admittedly it is nice to have trees in the road. But, I think it would have been better road design to give cyclists there own channel. The traffic calming measures where cyclists and motorists are squeezed together just creates more flash points where you get cars squeezing past you.

There seems to be no standard about cycle lanes and traffic calming measures. Everything seems ad-hoc as though it’s left upto whims of particular road designer.

cycle-lanes

Mind you it is good not to let the cycle path get overgrown like this one…. (bad cycle lanes)



4 Responses to Road Design for Creating More Space

  1. Valda Murphy July 7, 2012 at 8:45 am #

    Along with every little thing that seems to be building within this particular area, your opinions happen to be very exciting. However, I appologize, because I can not give credence to your whole suggestion, all be it radical none the less. It appears to everyone that your opinions are not totally rationalized and in fact you are your self not even completely certain of the argument. In any event I did appreciate looking at it.

  2. Rad Wagon June 26, 2012 at 9:24 am #

    I vaguely agree with Johnathan, although do note that when driving as you attempt to fit your car over the square bump you do actualy slow down. In The Netherlands they use road going from side to side to slow cars down, which is quite effective.

    As far as going past them on a bike, they can be okay, but most of the time they are awful. I have ot run the guantlet of one set that has just become terribly potholed with no sign of any fixes quite regularly here, as well as negotiating a badly enforced contraflow lane.

    http://radwagon.co.uk/2011/06/bateman-street.html

  3. Jonathan June 25, 2012 at 12:33 pm #

    When I am driving I hate speed bumps – more to the point the speed humps that are broken into square sections are little more than pointless, with a reasonable sized car your wheels go either side of them – therefore they do not cause a reduction in speed – but the manoeuvre to get your wheels each side means you divert from your normal position on the road.

    As a cyclist these broken speed humps are so dangerous as to beggar belief – I have lost count of the times I have a car go within a hairs breadth of me because they need to get their wheel each side of a hump. I would rather they went past me at 40 with a few cm more space!

    All speed bumps do is damage cars and waste fuel as cars accelerate / brake between them, they are not that fantastic to go over on a bike either! Really the only answer is the education and training of all road users, not that that will work often – Muppets will be Muppets – I am resigned to it.

  4. Steve June 25, 2012 at 11:16 am #

    There seems to be a fondness for traffic islands to slow traffic/prevent overtaking as well, which end up being worse for cycling than the obvious pinch points. Even worse is when a cycle lane is interrupted for exactly such a hazard, like here in Ipswich, where there’s a whole series of these:

    https://maps.google.co.uk/maps?q=ipswich&hl=en&ll=52.032292,1.133982&spn=0.001419,0.002009&sll=53.800651,-4.064941&sspn=11.175283,16.45752&hnear=Ipswich,+Suffolk,+United+Kingdom&t=h&z=19&layer=c&cbll=52.032369,1.133659&panoid=Pk4Q2M4bc-64w7udd2TRVA&cbp=12,20.8,,0,-0.72

Leave a Reply to Jonathan Click here to cancel reply.


+ 6 = 12